Great
Leap' on Washington State Mental Health ; Law Mandates Equal Insurance
Coverage
(Seattle Post
- Intelligencer)
Updated: Mar 11th 2005
Under
new consumer protections signed into law yesterday, 1.6 million
Washingtonians will be guaranteed coverage for psychiatric treatment.
For many patients, the law means insurers will
no longer be allowed to refuse to pay for office visits because the
doctor is a psychiatrist instead of an internist, or charge more for
prescriptions that treat depression than for medicines that treat
heartburn.
"This truly represents a great leap forward,"
said Gov. Christine Gregoire, who signed the bill into law. "When we
fail to treat mental illnesses in the same way we treat illnesses of the
body, it costs everybody."
Patient advocates and hospitals have been
fighting for the law for nearly a decade.
In Washington, some insurance policies don't
cover mental health treatment. Others provide coverage, but with weaker
terms than for medical or surgical coverage. For example, some limit the
length of hospital stays they will reimburse if the admission is for
psychiatric treatment. Some businesses said they couldn't afford to give
their workers health coverage unless they drew that distinction.
But insurers will now be required to provide
so-called mental health parity, according to the measure Gregoire
signed.
Although employers are not required to provide
their workers with insurance benefits, many state programs and larger
companies that do so will have to include mental health treatment.
Sally Stultz of Spokane Valley said her
17-year-old son is diagnosed with brain damage and bipolar disorder. She
said her family's insurer quickly cut off coverage after her son's
condition took a dangerous turn more than a year ago. He was skipping
school, running away and even shoplifting.
"He was, frankly, headed toward life on the
streets," she said. "He was careening out of control. I maxed out my
mental health insurance on him in one month's (hospital) stay because I
was just desperate to find something to help.
"Had he had the kind of coverage he needed
early on, he probably would have been in a whole lot better shape
today," she said, adding that such coverage also would have saved
taxpayers in educational and social services her son now receives.
Some businesses have predicted this measure
will force them to drop coverage for their employees. And over the
years, supporters of the measure have made substantial concessions.
Policies bought by individuals or through employers with 50 or fewer
workers will be exempt from House Bill 1154, which will be phased in
between 2006 and 2010.
"That's a problem," Stultz said. "There are
going to be a lot of people who lose out. And, of course, there's all
the downstream effects (of inadequate mental health care)."
Backers of the bill say untreated mental
illness leads to reduced productivity for some workers - and prison
sentences for others. As part of his condition, Stultz's son suffers
from memory problems that contribute to him making the same mistakes
repeatedly, Stultz said.
"Early on, if a lot of folks got what they
needed, they might not end up critical and in the jails," she said.
"It's inhumane, as far as I'm concerned. These folks, they don't need
prison; they need help.
"I feel like it's a measure of society - how
much a society is willing to take care of its own."
Many large employers are exempt because they
use so-called "self- insured plans," in which the employers cover the
cost of care. More than one-fifth of Washington policies are such plans,
which are not regulated by the state.
The two sides of the debate disagree over how
much it will cost.
Backers of the measure claim it will boost
insurance costs by a net of 0.44 percent after employers offset some of
their expenses through rate increases and benefit reductions. Opponents
say it will increase costs by 2 percent to 5 percent. And state budget
officials estimate it will increase taxpayer-supported health costs by
nearly $9 million a year when fully implemented.
The Insurance Commissioner's Office estimates
1.6 million Washingtonians are covered by policies that will be subject
to the new rule.
"It (won't) solve everything," Stultz said,
"but I know it would have made a difference for my son."
P-I reporter Chris McGann contributed to this
report, which includes information from The Associated Press.
P-I reporter Angela Galloway can be reached at
206-448-8333 or angelagalloway@seattlepi.com
|